The 2026 tipo table
Approved permits by type, January to July 2026:[2]
| Permit type | Approved, Jan-Jul 2026 | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Permiso de residente temporal | 8,141 | 36.9% |
| Prórrogas (extensions of temporary permits) | 4,279 | 19.4% |
| Permiso provisional | 3,091 | 14.0% |
| Permiso de residente permanente | 6,572 | 29.8% |
The four rows sum to the 22,083 approvals in the headline series. That sum is the table’s own arithmetic check.[2]
The report titles the table “permisos de residencia aprobados por tipo”, residence permits approved by type. The words matter. These are approvals, not applications. Every tipo number on this page is a subset of an approved total. None counts denials except where the 2025 table says so explicitly.[2]
One month distorts this table. July alone carried 1,837 of the 4,279 extensions. It carried 1,427 of the 6,572 permanent permits. Temporal permits also spiked in July, at 1,823 of their 8,141 total. Provisional’s July was 986. The other six months look nothing like this. The statistics page explains why, using the SNM’s own administrative-surge note.[2]
Extensions swung hard month to month even before July. March carried 900 of them. June carried 82. The monthly detail comes straight from the report’s tipo table.[2]
The 2025 comparison
The 2025 report shapes its tipo table differently. It splits each type by condition, approved against denied. It carries no monthly columns.[1]
| Permit type | Approved, 2025 | Denied, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Permiso de residente permanente | 13,149 | 442 |
| Permiso provisional | 11,633 | 576 |
| Permiso de residente temporal | 6,313 | 600 |
| Prórrogas | 2,167 | 137 |
Denials were rare in every type. The worst rate was temporal, at 600 denied against 6,313 approved. Provisional saw 576 denials against 11,633 approvals. Permanent saw 442 against 13,149.[1]
The like-for-like comparison is the approved column of 2025 against the totals of 2026. Both count approved permits. The denied column has no 2026 counterpart in the tipo table. The 2026 monthly columns have no 2025 counterpart. Mixing those shapes produces nonsense.[1][2]
Read them as shares of each year’s approvals. Permanent ran 39.5% of 2025 against 29.8% of the 2026 window. Provisional ran 35.0% against 14.0%. Extensions ran the other way, 6.5% of 2025 against 19.4% of 2026. The July surge of 1,837 extensions is most of that move.[1][2]
Tipo and condición are different cuts too. Condition splits the year’s files into approved and denied. Type splits the permits themselves. The statistics page carries the condition cut.
What each type is
Four labels, four different things. A temporary permit covers time-limited residence. A prórroga extends a temporary permit that is running out. A provisional permit is the interim stage of a permanent-track application. A permanent permit is the stable end status.[2]
The same four labels appear in both years’ reports, under the same names. That stability is what makes the two tables comparable at all.[1][2]
The labels are the SNM’s own. The report gives no definitions, only counts. Anything beyond the label is pathway mechanics, and mechanics live elsewhere on this site. How the two-year provisional stage converts to permanent is the provisional-to-permanent page. What permanent residency consists of, and which pathways grant it directly, is the permanent-residency page.
Tipo is not categoría. Type is the permit’s legal shape. Category is the program it came through, Friendly Nations or pensionado or the rest. The two cuts answer different questions. The category table lives on its own page, and the country cut on the by-nationality page.
Read the two years together and a normal month looks like this. Temporary permits and permanent permits dominate the count. Extensions run in the hundreds. Provisional sits between them. July breaks every one of those patterns. The next bulletin shows whether the extension surge was a one-off clearance or a new baseline.[2]
Last reviewed: