The three-flight layout
The canal’s locks are arranged in three flights, and their geography follows the lie of the land between the two oceans. On the Atlantic side, the Gatún locks form a three-step staircase that lifts a ship from sea level to Gatún Lake in three consecutive chambers [1]. On the Pacific side the lift is split across two flights: the single-chamber Pedro Miguel lock raises a ship one step to Miraflores Lake, and the two-chamber Miraflores locks then raise it the rest of the way to Gatún Lake (or lower it, for a southbound ship) [1]. Each flight is named for the town at which it sits, names that predate the canal itself [1].
The arrangement adds up to twelve chambers in six pairs, because every flight is built in duplicate, two lanes of chambers running side by side so that two columns of traffic can use the locks at once, in opposite directions or in the same direction as the schedule demands [1]. Gatún contributes three steps, Pedro Miguel one, and Miraflores two, making the six pairs [1]. The two-step Pacific flight was not always planned for Miraflores: the original design placed it at Sosa Hill, but in late 1907 the decision was taken to move it inland to Miraflores, both because the new site offered a more stable foundation and because it gave the locks greater protection from naval bombardment [1]. The total lift the system provides, from sea level to the surface of Gatún Lake, is roughly eighty-five feet, and it is that lift, not the excavation alone, that lets the canal cross the continental divide [1][2].
The chamber: 110 by 1,000 feet
Every chamber in the original lock system is the same size: 110 feet wide and 1,000 feet long, built in pairs [1]. The uniformity was a deliberate design choice that simplified construction and operation, and it is the dimension that defined the Panamax standard, the maximum ship size the canal could accept, for the entire century before the 2016 expansion [2]. The chambers are concrete structures of a scale that, at the time they were built, surpassed any comparable existing work and is still regarded as an engineering wonder [1]. The concrete itself was an undertaking: the locks required a volume of pour not matched until the construction of Boulder Dam in the 1930s, and after more than eighty years of service the lock concrete remains in near-perfect condition [1].
At Miraflores only, each chamber (except the lower locks) carries a set of intermediate gates that can reduce the effective chamber length to 600 feet [1]. The purpose is water conservation: when a ship smaller than the Panamax maximum transits, the intermediate gates close off the unused end of the chamber so that the lockage fills and empties only the volume the ship actually occupies. It is a small, early example of the same instinct, saving the freshwater that each lockage costs, that drives the water-saving basins of the 2016 expansion.
How a lockage works: gravity, culverts, and a hundred holes
The defining fact about the canal’s lock hydraulics is that no pumps are used. The water does its work by gravity alone [1]. To raise a ship, water flows from Gatún Lake into the upper chamber through the lock’s culvert system; to lower one, the water drains out to the lower level. The mechanism is a network of tunnels built into the lock walls and floor. Giant culverts, eighteen feet in diameter, run lengthwise within the centre and side walls of each flight; branching off them at right angles, smaller cross-culverts run laterally beneath the floor of each chamber, twenty to a chamber [1]. Each cross-culvert has five openings, for a total of a hundred holes in every chamber floor through which the water enters or drains [1].
The hundred holes are an anti-turbulence measure. By distributing the inflow across the full floor area rather than admitting it through a single opening, the design keeps the water in the chamber calm enough that a ship can be held steady as the level changes [1]. The valves that direct the flow (upper-end valves open to fill, lower-end valves open to empty) are themselves electrically driven, and the entire sequence is orchestrated from a control house rather than worked by hand [1]. The result is a lockage that moves a seagoing ship tens of feet vertically using nothing but the weight of fresh water from the lake above.
The safeguards layered around the gates are a measure of how catastrophic a gate failure would be. Because the lock gates function as dams holding back the elevated lake, the original design provided redundant protection at the points where a breach would join two different levels (the upper and lower ends of the upper lock in each flight, and both ends of the single-step Pedro Miguel lock) by installing an operating gate and a guard gate in series [1]. Iron fender chains once stretched across the chambers to stop a ship that broke free before it could strike a guard gate, releasing gradually to absorb the impact; the expense of maintaining them against the rarity of their use led to their removal between 1976 and 1980 [1]. Emergency dams, steel apparatus that could swing across a lock entrance in about two minutes and drop plates to seal the channel, were installed as a last line of defence and never used in anger before their removal in the 1950s [1]. The system was designed on the assumption that a single failure could drain Gatún Lake into the ocean, and it was built to make that failure effectively impossible.
Miter gates
The lock gates (the miter gates, so called because they close in a wide V) are the canal’s most visible moving parts [1]. They swing like a pair of double doors, and when closed the two leaves meet at an angle pointing upstream, so that the water pressure behind them pushes the gates more tightly shut rather than forcing them open [1]. Every gate leaf measures 64 feet wide and 7 feet thick, but they vary in height from 47 to 82 feet depending on where they sit in the system [1]. The tallest are the lower-chamber gates at Miraflores, built high to cope with the extreme variation of the Pacific tides [1].
The gates’ lower halves are hollow and watertight, which makes them buoyant in the water and greatly reduces the working load on their hinges, an elegant piece of design that lets very large steel structures be swung with manageable force [1]. The operating mechanism, designed by Edward Schildhauer, uses horizontal bull wheels set into the lock walls and steel struts connecting them to the gate leaves, working like the driving wheel and connecting rod of a locomotive to open and close the gates [1]. Against the risk of a ship breaking through a gate and draining the lake, the original design also installed guard gates, fender chains (removed in 1976–1980), and emergency dams (removed in the 1950s) as layered safeguards [1].
Towing locomotives and central control
Once a ship is inside a chamber, it has to be held in position, kept from drifting into the lock walls as the water rises or falls, and that work is done by the canal’s electric towing locomotives [1]. The locomotive system, also designed by Schildhauer, runs on track built atop the lock walls at a speed of about two miles per hour, with the locomotives connected to the ship by cables; they are built to climb the 45-degree inclines between chambers [1]. The original locomotives were built in Schenectady, New York, at a unit cost of $13,000 [1]. The all-electric character of the canal (roughly 1,500 electric motors ran the locks’ gates, valves, and locomotives) was itself an innovation in the first decade of the twentieth century [1].
The whole flight is run from a control house built on the centre wall of the upper lock, where a single operator at a waist-high control board, a mechanical miniature of the locks in which every switch sits beside the representation of the device it controls, can run the entire passage of a ship [1]. Beneath the board, racks of interlocking bars make the switches mechanically sequential: each handle must be turned in the correct order or it will not turn at all, eliminating the possibility of operating the locks out of sequence [1]. That control system has been in use, largely unchanged, for more than eight decades [1].
The 1913 commissioning
The locks came into service in a sequence across 1913, and the dates are worth tracking because they show the system being tested piece by piece. The Pacific-side flights were finished first, Pedro Miguel in 1911 and Miraflores in May 1913, and on 20 May 1913 the two steam shovels narrowing the gap in the Culebra Cut met at the bottom, forty feet above sea level, the cut’s full construction-era depth [1]. On 27 June 1913 the last spillway gate of the Gatún Dam was closed, allowing Gatún Lake to rise to its full height [1]. The seagoing tug Gatún made the first trial lockage at the Gatún locks on 26 September 1913, and on 10 October 1913 President Woodrow Wilson pressed a telegraph button in Washington that blew out the centre of the dike at Gamboa, flooding the Culebra Cut and joining it to Gatún Lake [1]. The lock system that opened to commercial traffic the following August was, in essence, the system commissioned across those 1913 milestones.
The 2016 companion: rolling gates and tugs
The 2016 expansion added a larger third lane of locks, Agua Clara on the Atlantic and Cocolí on the Pacific, and it made three deliberate departures from the 1914 engineering [2]. The new chambers are far larger, 180 by 1,400 feet, to admit Neopanamax ships [2]. They use rolling gates rather than miter gates, and tugboats rather than electric towing locomotives to position vessels, both proven technologies in locks of comparable size elsewhere [2]. And each new chamber is paired with three water-saving basins that capture and reuse three-fifths of the water per cycle, an addition the original locks do not have and that the canal’s freshwater constraint made necessary [2]. The two systems now run in parallel: the 1914 miter-gate locks with their locomotives and culverts, and the 2016 rolling-gate locks with their tugs and basins, together moving the canal’s traffic between the oceans.
Reading the locks
The canal’s locks are best understood as a single gravity-driven machine: a fixed envelope of twelve 110-by-1,000-foot chambers, sealed by miter gates and filled through a hundred floor holes each, lifting ships eighty-five feet to an artificial lake and lowering them again on the other side [1]. A reader who wants the construction history behind the 1913 commissioning should turn to the construction-history page; a reader who wants the 2016 expansion that now runs alongside these locks should consult the expansion page; and a reader interested in the freshwater the whole system depends on should read the Gatún Lake and drought-and-water pages. The locks are where the canal’s engineering is most visible, and they are also where the canal’s oldest and newest technology now sit side by side.
Last reviewed: